Should journalist use lies to fight lies? The Apple “slave” labor case
Apple is running into trouble recently. A recent U.K. newspaper report claims that workers at a Chinese iPod factory were working long hours, for little pay, and in "slave conditions". They were said to have been earning $50 a month (or about $1.60 a day) while working 15-hour shifts. The reporters visited two plants in the crowded country, one close to Shanghai and the other near Hong Kong. One, described as iPod City, was said to have 200,000 workers who lived in dormitories on the site.
Labor compensation is really terrible in China, but I don’t think these journalist should use lies to fight lies.
First, in the two locations where the journalist claim they investigate (I guess one in Kunshan and the other in Shenzhen), it is impossible to hire assembly workers at $50 /month. It is just impossible, not because the employers are benevolent, but because factories next doors will recruit away all you workers at the prevailing market price if you offer only $ 50/month.
Reading the report carefully (I guess most readers will only remember the headline numbers they throw out instead of finishing the whole report), however, you will find that $50/month is not the wage, but the net saving after deducting expenses as calucauted by the journalists. Should we say that some American workers are paid zero dollars/month because they rarely save money?
Interestingly, the real monthly salary number (about $100 /month) obtained by the journalists (I guess the number should be real, as journalists do not have incentive to over-report the number) meets the minimum wage requirement, which many labor activists believe to be fair but don't think are actively enforced! The report unexpectedly provides evidence that minimum wage law in China does have teeth!
$100 /month is small sum for British, but it is a lot of money in China. Why don’t the journalist make some attempt to put the number into perspective. In inland provinces, government employees (dream position for most local residents ) are paid $100/month. $300/month is also three times what Indian workers can get.
Why don’t the journalist tell readers what are the alternative income these workers could get if they don’t have a job in the factory? It is a poor country, and $100 /month is exactly the same as the country’s GDP per capita. The average monthly British GDP/per capita is over $2800, will you call a British worker who are paid $2800/month a slave!!
Second, in the past five years, Apple sold 42 million i-Pods. If 200,000 workers are employed to produce i-pods, then each worker produced only 210 i-pods so far. Don’t you think such productivity is ridiculously low. A Washington Post article reveals that the factory is not owned by Apple, but by a contract manufactures Hon Hai precision Industry, also known as Foxconn electronics Inc. Foxconn does employ 200,000 workers, but Apple is only a client, and only small fraction of the 200,000 workforce work on i-pods.
I really don’t know why the journalists want to throw out a sensational number of "200,000 workers", and the so-called “iPod city” name, just to exploit the popularity of iPod brand name? And “the 200,000 workers in one site” description also tries to get readers to have an impression that all 200,000 workers are fit into one dorm room!
I want to say to the journalist of Mail on Sunday (the U.K. newspaper that reports the story):
The best weapon of journalists is fact and truth, if you degrade yourself to the same level of a lying regime, you bring shame to the whole journalist community!
Interestingly, Mail on Sunday doesn't put the report online. Are you fearing of sunshine?
Reference:
Sweatshop conditions at iPod factory reported
Apple eyes labor conditions at iPod plant
Update:
found that Perry Wu in the ChinaTechNews.com has the same views as mine, in his article "Hyperbolic Apple iPod factory woes"
Sun Bin recommends a blog post "A Chinese view of iPod City", which provides a nice summary of the event and coverage. Thanks.







please see the 'tianya' forum post at the end of this
http://www.zonaeuropa.com/20060623_1.htm
where the worker explained how the factory impose 'penalty' to pay below minimum wage.
however, when businesses are good. they probably earn more than that.
Posted by: sunbin | June 22, 2006 at 08:19 PM
SHIT!Mail on Sunday reports the truth!
Posted by: peter | August 31, 2006 at 10:09 PM
Apple and NIKE and many others try and tell the public they are investigating these claims when really they dont care as they know the conditions and they have chosen to build their products knowing what would happen, its never going to stop unless another country boycotts it with better quality made products
APPLE YOUR BIG FAT LIARS!!!
Posted by: YOUR A REAL LIAR APPLE | September 26, 2007 at 07:45 AM
xanax helps, but may be you need other drugs, not xanax.
Order xanax and other Medications Online.
xanax and serapax
xanax without prescription
xanax without prescription
buy xanax without a prescription
xanax side effects
xanax side effects
side effects of xanax
Posted by: UnCoot | February 09, 2008 at 07:57 AM